Maryland Handgun Law Ruled Too Restrictive

In what might be considered a remarkable continuation of recent official recognitions of the constitutional and natural right to obtain and maintain the relevant means to self-defense, a federal judge ruled Maryland’s highly restrictive firearms permit laws as unconstitutional today.  District Judge Benson Legg wrote that “a citizen may not be required to offer a ‘good and substantial reason’ why he should be permitted to exercise his rights,” and that “the right’s existence is all the reason he needs.”

High praise from all individual rights advocates is due to Judge Legg in his frank and appropriate ruling.  The state quickly decided to appeal the decision, naturally, so there is a significant possibility that the case may one day wind its way to the Supreme Court, as District of Columbia v. Heller (2008) and McDonald v. Chicago (2010) eventually did.  While I agree with the court’s opinion that requiring law abiding citizens to prove their respective “needs” to legally possess and carry a firearm for lawful purposes is inconsistent with individual freedom, I have no doubt that this will turn into a long, bitter fight amongst the several interested parties.

It will be interesting to observe how this issue is ultimately resolved and I am hopeful that once again reason and a healthy respect for individual liberty will prevail.

Advertisements

, , , ,

  1. Partial Victory In the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals |

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: